2.18.2011

Nikon joins the F1.8 compact club



Even after using a preproduction model for the past few days, I've really had a hard time classifying the new Nikon Coolpix P300. As part of its P series, geared to enthusiasts, you'd think Nikon was taking on models like the popular Canon PowerShot S95 and the newOlympus XZ-1. But while it has the basic black, no-nonsense design, fast lens and broad manual feature set of those models, it uses a relatively small but backside-illuminated (BSI) 1/2.3-inch sensor similar to mainstream consumer cameras like the Ixus 300 HS--it's priced lower than the former and higher than the latter. 

Overall, I really like the camera's design. Though it lacks the lens-ring control of the Canon and the Olympus, the P300's pair of dials--one on the top right and one doubling as four-way switches for exposure compensation, macro, flash and self-timer--provide a nice feel for fast shooting adjustments. Despite being on the small side, it's still fairly comfortable to hold, with a grippy stripe in the front for extra security. And the popup flash's split design means that you still have a spot on the top left for your fingers while the flash is open. The LCD looks big, bright, and relatively high resolution as well. I also like the dedicated movie-record button, which doesn't require choosing a dedicated mode on the dial. 

My one gripe with the design is the menu and delete buttons, which sit below the navigation dial, are too flat and difficult to feel. 

As for features, here's a comparative summary:
Like a lot of cameras with BSI sensors, it has several multishot modes for improved low-light quality. 

I have to admit; as part of the P series, I really expected that this would be Nikon's answer to the S95--an ultracompact with the P7000's sensor--rather than the Ixus 300 HS, though no doubt Nikon sensibly enough considers the manual controls sufficient reason to position it this way. 

As for its potential, a lot will be riding on image quality and performance (we can't comment on those based on the preproduction unit); ultimately, it's not worth paying more for a nice set of manual controls if it doesn't deliver on the photo quality. We look forward to putting it to the test. 

Via Crave CNET

0 comments:

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites